# \[Discuss\] Running graphs when ops aren't supported

**URL:** <https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/discuss-running-graphs-when-ops-arent-supported/4482>\
**Category:** RFC\
**Created:** [October 24, 2019, 10:15pm UTC](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/discuss-running-graphs-when-ops-arent-supported/4482 "2019-10-24T22:15:19Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 32

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![xutianming](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/user_avatar/discuss.tvm.apache.org/xutianming/32/2064_2.png) [@xutianming](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/u/xutianming)\
**Post date:** [October 23, 2020, 8:19am UTC](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/discuss-running-graphs-when-ops-arent-supported/4482/32 "2020-10-23T08:19:12Z")

</div>

We also came into similar issues when compiling various models using TVM. Improving operator coverage is definitely an option. Finding a more general way to support more models is also worth exploring.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/discuss-running-graphs-when-ops-arent-supported/4482)._
