# \[C/C++ runtime\] multimodel support

**URL:** <https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/c-c-runtime-multimodel-support/8518>\
**Category:** RFC\
**Created:** [November 25, 2020, 12:06am UTC](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/c-c-runtime-multimodel-support/8518 "2020-11-25T00:06:06Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mikeseven](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/user_avatar/discuss.tvm.apache.org/mikeseven/32/535_2.png) [@mikeseven](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/u/mikeseven)\
**Post date:** [November 25, 2020, 6:42pm UTC](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/c-c-runtime-multimodel-support/8518/3 "2020-11-25T18:42:47Z")

</div>

Thanks for splitting the proposal.

Replying about F1 Yes we can generate multiple libraries but the issue is linking them together. Specifically, there is no way to differentiate inputs vs params/weights. There is no way to know the name of the outputs as they have been mangled after simplification.

About F2 Yes it may be useful for debugging but once release I don’t see any need to keep long names. At release, all one needs are inputs (not params) and outputs names.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/c-c-runtime-multimodel-support/8518)._